FinancingFeed working capital, export credit, trade finance & asset leasing — explore options

Cost of a wrong decision

Why the cheapest feed mill proposal may cost more over time

Short answer

A lower CAPEX usually reflects one of four things: a narrower scope, a lower real throughput on your recipe, higher energy consumption per tonne, or a thinner aftermarket package. Each of those is paid for later. A plant producing 15% less tonnage than assumed, or consuming 5 kWh more per tonne, erodes the CAPEX saving within the first years of operation, and a weak spare-part and service position converts a single failure into lost production. Compare scope-adjusted CAPEX per expected tonne per hour, then model energy, wear parts, labour and downtime over the operating life.

Cheapest is a valid outcome — but only after the proposals describe the same plant producing the same tonnage at the same operating cost.

Compare feed mill quotations on one scope

The four ways a low price is recovered

  • Scope: excluded civil, electrical, boiler, installation or spares
  • Throughput: nominal capacity quoted against a favourable reference recipe
  • Energy: lower-cost motors and process configuration with higher kWh per tonne
  • Aftermarket: longer spare lead times, no local service, shorter warranty

What to model before deciding

  • Scope-adjusted CAPEX with excluded lines priced locally
  • CAPEX per expected tonne per hour on your own recipe
  • Annual energy cost at your tariff and expected kWh per tonne
  • Wear-part consumption per tonne for dies, rolls, screens and hammers
  • Labour requirement at the offered automation level
  • Cost of one week of unplanned downtime with the offered service response

Questions buyers ask

Should I always reject the lowest quotation?
No. Reject only the comparison, not the supplier. Adjust every proposal to one scope and one throughput basis; if the lowest price survives that adjustment along with acceptable energy, service and warranty terms, it is genuinely the lowest cost.
How far ahead should lifecycle cost be modelled?
Five and ten years are the practical horizons for feed mill decisions, because wear parts, energy and labour dominate cumulative cost long before major equipment replacement.

Continue the decision

Compare feed mill quotations on one scope

Write the requirement once and send the same document to every supplier you are considering, including one you already prefer. FeedMatch sells nothing and takes no part in the contract.

Compare feed mill quotations on one scope

Scope and neutrality

  • FeedMatch Group is an independent, supplier-neutral procurement platform. It does not manufacture, install or commission feed-processing equipment and is not an EPC contractor.
  • FeedMatch does not sell feed, ingredients, premixes or additives and does not act as a trader.
  • FeedMatch is not a bank, lender, credit provider or financial adviser. Financing, where relevant, is arranged by independent third parties.
  • Calculator outputs and planning ranges on this site are indicative inputs for your own evaluation, not quotations, nutritional advice or performance guarantees.
Get a Free QuoteExplore Financing