Question 1

What is FeedMatch?

Accepted Answer

FeedMatch is a supplier-neutral feed sourcing and feed-production procurement platform. It helps buyers and consultants define the requirement — a finished-feed programme or a feed-mill project — use planning tools and calculators, prepare a structured RFQ, research relevant suppliers and manufacturers, and organise the proposals that come back so they can be compared on the same basis. FeedMatch does not manufacture feed, does not sell equipment, is not a nutrition consultancy and is not an engineering contractor.

Question 2

How is FeedMatch different from a feed supplier directory or an equipment marketplace?

Accepted Answer

A directory or marketplace starts with the supplier or the product listing. FeedMatch starts with the requirement: species and feed types, volumes or capacity, raw materials, process route, utilities, storage, packaging, logistics and timeline are defined first, and only then are suppliers or manufacturers researched. The practical difference is comparability — a defined baseline means several proposals answer the same scope instead of each supplier quoting its own assumptions.

Question 3

What information should be defined before requesting feed mill proposals?

Accepted Answer

Define, in writing: species and feed types, target capacity in tonnes per hour and per year, operating hours and shift pattern, available raw materials and their form, the process route (grinding, mixing, pelleting and/or extrusion, cooling, coating), storage for raw materials and finished feed, packaging and bulk outloading, automation level, available power and utilities, country and site conditions, expansion plans, timeline and — where appropriate — budget band. Without these, manufacturers quote against different assumptions.

Question 4

How do I prepare a professional feed mill RFQ?

Accepted Answer

A professional feed mill RFQ contains: a project overview and location; target capacity and feed types; raw materials; the intended process flow from intake through grinding, mixing, pelleting or extrusion, cooling, storage and packaging; automation and control requirements; power and utility limits; the scope the manufacturer must quote (supply only, supply and installation, or turnkey); timeline; supporting drawings or site data; and the required proposal format so answers arrive in a comparable structure.

Question 5

How should finished-feed sourcing requirements be structured?

Accepted Answer

State species and life stage, feed type and physical form, the quality and specification parameters with tolerances and test methods, monthly and annual quantity, packaging, delivery location and Incoterm, delivery frequency and schedule, required documentation per lot, timeline and the commercial terms you expect. Clear sourcing requirements are what make supplier responses comparable; anything left open becomes a supplier assumption and a hidden price difference.

Question 6

What information do feed equipment manufacturers need before preparing a serious proposal?

Accepted Answer

Manufacturers need the production brief and the site reality: feed types and species, capacity per hour and per year, operating hours, raw materials and their condition, required process stages, target finished-feed quality attributes such as pellet size or durability expectations, storage volumes, packaging formats, automation level, available electrical power and steam or thermal capability, building or site constraints, country and logistics context, timeline and the scope they are asked to price.

Question 7

How can feed mill equipment proposals be compared more accurately?

Accepted Answer

Compare scope before price. Line up each proposal on guaranteed capacity per process stage, process scope (grinding, mixing, pelleting, extrusion, cooling, coating), storage, packaging, automation and control, installed power and energy requirement, installation and commissioning, training, warranty, spare parts, delivery terms and timeline — then compare CapEx and, where the data supports it, operating implications. Two quotations with the same headline price frequently contain different scopes.

Question 8

What calculators and project tools can help plan a feed-production project?

Accepted Answer

FeedMatch publishes free planning tools that turn assumptions into numbers you can put in an RFQ: a feed requirements calculator for tonnage and specification, feed mill capacity and capacity-expansion tools, a bottleneck calculator, production cost per tonne, an energy calculator, a labour cost calculator, a storage-days calculator and a total-cost-of-ownership calculator, plus the RFQ builder and the five-step planning workflow. Outputs are planning estimates for structuring an enquiry, not engineering guarantees.

Question 9

Can feed consultants and nutrition specialists use FeedMatch for client projects?

Accepted Answer

Yes. Feed consultants and nutrition specialists use FeedMatch as procurement infrastructure behind their own client work: bring the project, keep the client relationship, use the platform to structure the requirement, run the planning tools, prepare the RFQ and organise supplier or manufacturer proposals. FeedMatch supports the procurement mechanics; it does not replace professional nutrition, veterinary or engineering judgment, and it does not take over the consultant's client relationship.

Question 10

Why should raw materials, capacity, milling, mixing, pelleting or extrusion, storage and packaging be planned as one project?

Accepted Answer

Because each element constrains the next. Raw materials affect formulation; formulation affects processing; processing affects equipment selection; equipment affects achievable capacity; capacity affects storage; storage affects operations; packaging affects logistics; and energy affects operating cost. Deciding any one of them in isolation forces expensive rework later, so all of them should be set against one project baseline before supplier outreach begins.

Question 11

Does FeedMatch match my farm with a feed supplier automatically?

Accepted Answer

No. FeedMatch is requirement-first, not an automatic matching marketplace. The process starts with the farm's feed requirement — species, production stage, feed type and form, monthly and annual tonnage, buyer or nutritionist specification, packaging, destination, delivery schedule and documentation. That requirement becomes a structured RFQ. Only then are feed manufacturers, mills and traders whose stated scope fits the requirement researched and approached, and their offers normalised against the same specification with human procurement support. Browsing the supplier directory is research, not the purchasing workflow.

Question 12

How do I source bulk animal feed internationally?

Accepted Answer

Start from a written specification, not a product name. Define species and life stage, feed format, monthly and annual tonnage, delivery port or plant, packaging and required documentation, then send the identical specification to several independent producers and traders so their offers are comparable. Compare landed cost per tonne under one Incoterm, not ex-works price. FeedMatch structures that request into an RFQ and then researches and approaches independent suppliers that fit it; the supplier remains responsible for the product, its specification and the contract.

Question 13

What should a commercial feed RFQ contain?

Accepted Answer

A usable feed RFQ states: species and life stage; feed format; the nutrient and quality parameters with tolerances and test methods; monthly and annual volume; delivery location and Incoterm; packaging and pallet or bulk handling; required certificates and documents per lot; the delivery schedule; validity of the offer; and the price basis or adjustment mechanism. Anything omitted becomes a supplier assumption, and assumptions are what make quotations non-comparable.

Question 14

How should landed cost per tonne be compared between offers?

Accepted Answer

Bring every offer to the same delivery point and the same tonne. Add ocean or road freight, insurance, port and terminal handling, customs duty and clearance, inland transport, financing cost over the transit period, and losses or moisture adjustment where the contract allows them. Then divide by the delivered tonnage actually usable. A lower FOB price frequently loses to a higher CFR price once handling, duty and transit financing are included.

Question 15

Should a feed buyer purchase EXW, FOB, CFR, CIF or DDP?

Accepted Answer

The right Incoterm is the one that matches who can actually control and insure each leg. Buyers with their own freight contracts and clearance capability usually gain on FOB; buyers new to a corridor typically prefer CFR or CIF so the seller arranges main carriage; DDP shifts import clearance to the seller and is often priced defensively. Whichever is chosen, apply the same one across all offers being compared.

Question 16

What documents should accompany each feed shipment?

Accepted Answer

Expect, as a baseline: commercial invoice and packing list; transport document (bill of lading, CMR or airway bill); certificate of origin; lot-level certificate of analysis; and, depending on product and destination, veterinary or health certificate, phytosanitary certificate, fumigation certificate, GMO or non-GMO declaration, and the plant's feed-safety certification. Destination authorities set the binding list — confirm it before shipment, not after arrival.

Question 17

Spot purchase or annual supply contract?

Accepted Answer

Use spot buying when consumption is irregular, storage is limited or the market is falling; use a term contract when a mill needs guaranteed continuity, uniform quality and a predictable price mechanism. Most industrial buyers run a hybrid: a contracted base volume covering committed production plus spot purchases for the variable share. Term contracts should carry a stated price-adjustment formula rather than a fixed price the seller cannot hold.

Question 18

What specifications should be requested for a protein meal such as soybean meal?

Accepted Answer

Request crude protein and the moisture basis it is expressed on, moisture, crude fat, crude fibre, ash, urease activity or protein solubility as a processing indicator, and the contaminant panel relevant to origin — mycotoxins, heavy metals and, where applicable, salmonella. Request the analytical method for each parameter and a lot-level certificate of analysis. Generic reference tables describe what a material typically is; only the COA and independent testing describe the lot you are buying.

Question 19

Is a supplier certificate of analysis enough, or should I test independently?

Accepted Answer

A COA is a supplier declaration for a specific lot and is the minimum, not the verification. For a new supplier, a new origin, a high-risk contaminant or a high-value contract, take an independent sample at loading or discharge and test at an accredited laboratory against the same methods named in the contract. Agree in advance whose result governs and how a discrepancy is resolved, because that clause decides who pays for a failed lot.

Question 20

How should mycotoxin and contaminant limits be handled in a purchase contract?

Accepted Answer

Name the specific contaminants, the maximum level, the analytical method and the sampling plan in the contract, and align the limits with the legislation of the destination country rather than the country of origin. Limits differ by jurisdiction, by species and sometimes by life stage. Treat mycotoxin risk as a sampling and storage problem as much as a purchase problem: post-arrival conditions can change the outcome of a compliant lot.

Question 21

How should alternative or co-product ingredients be evaluated?

Accepted Answer

Evaluate on delivered nutrient cost, not headline price per tonne: cost per unit of digestible protein or metabolizable energy, adjusted for variability, anti-nutritional factors, contaminant risk, handling behaviour and reliability of supply. An alternative that is cheaper on paper can raise total diet cost once inclusion is capped, another ingredient must compensate, or batch variability forces a safety margin. Any substitution requires a nutritionist's approval before it enters production.

Question 22

How are storage and shelf-life risks managed for imported feed materials?

Accepted Answer

Plan for the climate the goods will actually sit in. Control incoming moisture, temperature at intake, turnover rate and pest management, and monitor stored lots rather than assuming the arrival COA still applies. Fat-containing materials oxidize, high-moisture materials mould, and vitamin activity in premixes declines over time. Storage conditions, not the purchase, determine whether an accepted lot is still usable at the point of mixing.

Question 23

What is the difference between a premix and a concentrate?

Accepted Answer

A premix is a low-inclusion carrier blend of micro-ingredients — vitamins, trace minerals and often amino acids, enzymes or other additives — designed to be mixed into a complete diet at a small percentage. A concentrate carries a much larger share of the diet, typically including protein sources, and is diluted with locally sourced grain. Premixes suit mills that formulate; concentrates suit buyers who want fewer purchased components and less formulation work.

Question 24

What information does a supplier need to quote a custom premix?

Accepted Answer

Give the nutritionist-approved specification: each active substance with its declared level per kilogram of premix, the target inclusion rate in the finished feed, the carrier and particle-size preference, species and life stage, packaging size, required certifications, shelf-life expectation and the destination country for regulatory clearance. Without the inclusion rate, a per-kilogram declaration cannot be checked against the diet, and quotations cannot be compared at all.

Question 25

How should competing feed-additive proposals be compared?

Accepted Answer

Compare on cost per tonne of finished feed at the recommended dose, on the authorisation status of the substance in your market, on the evidence behind the claim, and on the documentation the supplier will provide per lot. Supplier trial material is commercial evidence, not independent proof of animal performance. Where a claim would change a diet or a health outcome, it belongs with your nutritionist or veterinarian, not in a purchasing comparison.

Question 26

Who carries regulatory responsibility for feed additives and premixes?

Accepted Answer

Responsibility sits with the parties that place the product on the market and use it: the additive authorisation holder, the manufacturer of the premix or feed, the importer of record, and the operator feeding the animals. A sourcing platform that introduces buyer and supplier is not a placer on the market. FeedMatch does not hold authorisations, does not certify products and does not assume the compliance duties of a manufacturer or importer.

Question 27

What should a buyer specify when procuring broiler feed by growth phase?

Accepted Answer

Broiler programmes are normally split into starter, grower and finisher phases with different nutrient density, particle size and physical form, so each phase must be quoted as a separate line with its own specification, tonnage and delivery schedule. Specify format (crumb or pellet), pellet durability expectation, phase volumes matched to placement plans, and the documentation required per lot. Nutrient targets for each phase must come from your nutritionist or your integrator's programme.

Question 28

What is different about sourcing fish and shrimp feed?

Accepted Answer

Aqua feed is water-stable extruded or pelleted feed, so physical performance — sinking or floating behaviour, water stability, pellet size by animal size and fines content — is part of the specification, not a detail. Marine ingredient origin, traceability and contaminant profile are scrutinised more closely, and feeding regimes are size-graded, so a single order usually covers several pellet sizes. Quote each size as its own line item.

Question 29

How does dairy feed procurement differ from beef feed procurement?

Accepted Answer

Dairy purchasing usually centres on concentrates and protein sources that complement home-grown forage, and is judged against milk output and component quality; beef purchasing is weighted toward energy sources and finishing rations. In both cases the forage base determines what needs to be bought, so a purchase decision made without the forage analysis is guesswork. Have the forage tested and let the nutritionist set the concentrate specification before issuing the RFQ.

Question 30

What equipment is required for a commercial feed mill?

Accepted Answer

A mash line needs intake and cleaning, storage, grinding, batching and dosing, mixing, and bagging or bulk dispatch. Pelleting adds conditioning, a pellet mill, cooling, crumbling and sieving; extrusion adds a preconditioner, extruder, dryer and often a coater. Around that sit dust control, magnets and sieves, automation and a quality laboratory. The correct list follows from the product mix and throughput, not from a catalogue.

Question 31

Mash, pellets or extrusion — how is the feed format chosen?

Accepted Answer

Mash is the lowest capital and energy cost and suits some ruminant and layer operations; pelleting improves handling, reduces separation and waste and is standard for most poultry and swine feed; extrusion is required where high starch gelatinisation, water stability or floating behaviour is needed, notably aqua feed and pet food. The format changes both the equipment list and the energy cost per tonne, so decide it before sizing the plant.

Question 32

How should feed-mill equipment proposals be compared?

Accepted Answer

Compare scope before price. Put every proposal on one scope matrix: equipment supplied, capacity guaranteed at a named recipe and moisture, installed power, spare parts, control system and integration, civil and utility works excluded, erection and supervision, training, FAT and SAT criteria, warranty terms and lead time. Differences in exclusions, not in machine price, are what usually separate two proposals that look similar.

Question 33

What should factory acceptance testing and commissioning include?

Accepted Answer

FAT should test what you will later be unable to change: control logic, dosing accuracy, mixer coefficient of variation, safety interlocks and documentation completeness. Commissioning and SAT should verify capacity at the contract recipe, energy consumption, pellet quality or extrusion parameters, dust and emissions behaviour, and operator training. Write both acceptance protocols into the purchase contract with pass criteria and a remedy — an acceptance test without a defined consequence has no commercial weight.

Question 34

What is least-cost formulation, and why is the cheapest formula not always suitable?

Accepted Answer

Least-cost formulation is a linear-optimization method that finds the cheapest combination of available ingredients satisfying stated nutrient and inclusion constraints. It is only as good as its constraints and its nutrient matrix. A mathematically optimal diet can still be unsuitable if it ignores digestibility, anti-nutritional factors, palatability, physical quality, ingredient variability or regulatory limits. Optimization is a purchasing input; nutritional approval is a professional judgement.

Question 35

What affects feed conversion ratio in a commercial operation?

Accepted Answer

FCR is a system outcome, not a feed property. Genetics, health status, environment and housing, water quality, feed form and particle size, feeder management, wastage, mortality and the accuracy of the diet all move it. Because of that, no supplier and no platform can promise an FCR from a specification alone. Use FCR ranges only for planning tonnage and sensitivity analysis, and validate against your own historical records.

Question 36

How much does a feed mill cost and what affects its return?

Accepted Answer

Capital cost is driven by throughput, product format, degree of automation, storage capacity, civil works and local utility conditions — the same nominal capacity can differ severalfold between a mash plant and an extrusion plant. Return depends on the spread between produced feed cost and the alternative purchase price, on utilisation, energy and labour cost, ingredient buying capability and financing terms. Model utilisation honestly: an underloaded plant rarely repays.

Question 37

What trade-finance structures exist for feed purchases, and is FeedMatch a lender?

Accepted Answer

FeedMatch is not a bank, lender, broker or financial adviser and provides no credit, guarantee or financing commitment. Structures commonly used in feed and grain trade — documentary credits, standby credits, documentary collections, supplier credit, receivables or inventory finance and, for equipment, buyer credit or export-credit-agency-supported facilities — are provided by regulated financial institutions. FeedMatch can only help organise the documentation an applicant would normally be asked for.

Question 38

What is FeedMatch Group — a manufacturer, trader, nutritionist or lender?

Accepted Answer

FeedMatch Group is an independent B2B sourcing and procurement-coordination platform for commercial animal feed, feed ingredients, premixes, additives and feed-processing equipment. It helps buyers structure requirements and connect with independent producers, mills, traders, manufacturers, laboratories, integrators and equipment providers. It does not manufacture feed, does not own ingredients, does not issue final commercial formulations, does not give veterinary advice, does not certify compliance, is not an EPC contractor and is not a lender.

Question 39

What is the difference between finished-feed sourcing and feed-mill procurement?

Accepted Answer

They are two separate procurement journeys and should not be mixed. Finished-feed sourcing buys ready-made compound feed, concentrates or premixes against a nutritional and commercial specification, and the counterparty is a feed supplier. Feed-mill procurement buys production capability — process equipment, storage, packaging, automation and installation — and the counterparty is an equipment manufacturer or integrator. A buyer purchasing finished feed does not need to answer grinder, mixer or pellet-mill questions.

Question 40

Does FeedMatch help buyers source finished animal feed?

Accepted Answer

Yes. For finished feed — compound feed, concentrates, premixes and feed raw materials — FeedMatch helps a buyer write the requirement (species, production stage, feed type and form, volume, specification, packaging, delivery and documentation), turn it into a structured RFQ, research suppliers whose declared scope matches, and organise the returning offers so they can be compared on one basis. FeedMatch does not manufacture, own, trade or ship feed.

Question 41

Does FeedMatch help buyers plan feed mills and feed-production lines?

Accepted Answer

Yes. For feed-production projects FeedMatch helps define feed types and raw materials, target capacity, the process route through grinding, mixing, pelleting or extrusion, cooling, storage, packaging, automation and utilities; provides planning calculators; converts the result into a structured RFQ; and organises manufacturer proposals for comparison. FeedMatch does not manufacture, sell, install or commission equipment and is not an EPC contractor.

Question 42

What information is needed before requesting a finished-feed quote?

Accepted Answer

Define, in writing: animal species and production stage; feed type and physical form (mash, crumble, pellet, extruded); required quantity per delivery and per year; the specification the feed must meet; packaging (bulk, big bag, sacks) and palletisation; delivery location, Incoterm and frequency; start date and contract period; logistics constraints such as silo or unloading capability; and any documentation or certification the destination requires. Without these, suppliers quote different products.

Question 43

How should finished-feed supplier proposals be compared?

Accepted Answer

Compare proposals field by field against the same requirement before comparing price: declared specification and analysis basis, product form, quantity and minimum order, packaging, Incoterm and delivery point, lead time and delivery frequency, logistics responsibility, documentation supplied per lot, payment and contract terms, price-adjustment mechanism, and what each supplier explicitly excludes. Price alone does not indicate feed quality or on-farm performance.

Question 44

Why should feed procurement begin with a defined requirement rather than a supplier search?

Accepted Answer

Because without a written requirement each supplier answers a different question. A defined requirement fixes the variables — species and feed type or feed types and capacity, volumes, specification or process scope, packaging or storage, delivery or installation, documentation and timeline — so every proposal is quoted against the same baseline and differences reflect real scope rather than different assumptions. Supplier search is faster and shorter once the requirement exists.

Question 45

When is an independent feed-procurement platform the right route, and when is it not?

Accepted Answer

It fits commercial and industrial purchases: bulk or recurring supply, several suppliers quoting one specification, lot documentation that has to be compared, cross-border logistics where origin and Incoterms move the cost, entry into a new supply market, feed-mill equipment packages, or a nutritionist-approved specification that needs commercial sourcing. It does not fit retail bags, household pets, individual-animal feeding advice, veterinary diagnosis, medicated-feed prescriptions or guaranteed prices and financing.

Question 46

How should a commercial farm source finished animal feed?

Accepted Answer

Define the requirement before contacting suppliers. Record the species and production stage, the feed type and physical form, the quantity per order and per month, packaging, delivery location and schedule, and any specification or documentation the operation needs. Send that same requirement to several suppliers as one structured RFQ, then compare proposals on delivered cost, specification match and supply reliability rather than price per ton.

Question 47

What information does a feed supplier need to quote a commercial farm?

Accepted Answer

A feed supplier usually needs the animal species, production stage, feed type or required specification, expected quantity, packaging preference, delivery location, required delivery schedule and any applicable quality or documentation requirements. More detailed nutritional specifications may also be required where the buyer already works with a nutritionist or a defined formulation.

Question 48

How should a farm compare feed suppliers?

Accepted Answer

Compare suppliers against the same feed requirement — animal category, production stage, specification, physical form, quantity, packaging, delivery terms, documentation and payment conditions. Only then compare total delivered cost and supply reliability rather than headline price per ton. Commercial feed quotations should not be compared on price per ton alone: specification, packaging, order size, freight, delivery frequency, payment terms and required documentation can materially change the real value of an offer.

Question 49

Why is the lowest feed price per ton not the lowest cost?

Accepted Answer

Because the comparable figure is delivered cost at the farm on the same specification. Build it from the feed price on the quoted Incoterm plus packaging, freight, insurance where applicable, import charges where applicable, local transport and on-farm storage implied by the order size. An ex-works price and a delivered price are not comparable until freight to the same destination is added.

Question 50

Pellets, mash or crumble — which feed format should a farm buy?

Accepted Answer

None is universally better. Pellets handle well in bulk and in mechanical feeding systems and must be specified by size; crumbles are commonly used for young animals; mash usually carries lower processing cost but more handling, dust and separation considerations. The format follows the animals, the feeding equipment and the storage on site, and should be stated explicitly in the RFQ.

Question 51

Can a farm use its own nutritionist's feed specification in the RFQ?

Accepted Answer

Yes. Where a farm already works with a nutritionist, veterinarian or technical advisor, the existing feed specification or formulation is used as supplied in the RFQ. FeedMatch structures the procurement process around that specification and does not overwrite it with generic assumptions, and it does not replace professional nutritional advice.

Question 52

Why does supply reliability matter as much as feed price?

Accepted Answer

Feed is a recurring input, so a supplier who cannot sustain the delivery rhythm forces buffer stock, emergency purchases or feed changes. Assess monthly capacity available to the account, lead time, sustainable delivery frequency, seasonal constraints, behaviour when a shipment slips, and whether a second qualified supplier should be held for continuity.

Question 53

How much feed should a farm order per delivery?

Accepted Answer

Order size follows expected consumption, on-farm storage capacity, shelf life, lead time and the supplier's minimum order quantity. Actual feed intake varies by species, genetics, age, environment, health, production stage and management, so any planning figure is an estimate and should be reconciled against the farm's own consumption records.

Question 54

Which FeedMatch tool should a farm use to plan and buy finished feed?

Accepted Answer

Size the order with the feed consumption calculator, write the requirement with the feed requirements calculator, check what your storage can absorb with the farm feed storage calculator, issue one structured RFQ with the RFQ builder, and normalise the offers that come back with the landed cost comparison. A published directory states each tool's inputs, output, assumptions, limitations and next step.

Question 55

What is a vitamin premix?

Accepted Answer

A vitamin premix is a concentrated blend of vitamin actives on a carrier, added at a low inclusion rate so that a complete feed reaches the vitamin levels set by the buyer's formulator. Commercial blends are usually built to a customer schedule rather than sold as one standard product, which is why two premix quotations are rarely comparable until the declared actives and the inclusion rate are fixed.

Question 56

What is the difference between a vitamin premix and a vitamin–mineral premix?

Accepted Answer

A vitamin premix carries vitamin actives only. A vitamin–mineral premix also carries trace minerals, and sometimes macro minerals, in the same pack. The choice affects carrier volume, inclusion rate, stability, segregation risk and the cost basis used for comparison, so the RFQ should state which of the two is required before suppliers quote.

Question 57

How is premix inclusion normally expressed?

Accepted Answer

Premix inclusion is expressed in kilograms per tonne of finished feed, and the commercially relevant figure is premix cost per tonne of finished feed rather than price per kilogram of premix. The inclusion rate itself must be set and approved by the buyer's qualified nutrition adviser for the species, feed phase and destination market.

Question 58

What is DL-methionine used for in feed?

Accepted Answer

DL-methionine is a synthetic feed-grade source of the sulphur amino acid methionine, used so that a diet meets the methionine specification set by the formulator without over-supplying crude protein. Inclusion levels, species suitability and any substitution must be approved by the buyer's qualified nutrition and veterinary advisers.

Question 59

What is the difference between DL-methionine and liquid MHA for buyers?

Accepted Answer

DL-methionine is a dry powder sold on an assay basis; liquid methionine hydroxy analogue is a liquid product quoted with a bio-equivalence factor and different handling, storage and dosing requirements. Offers can only be compared once both are converted to the same active-equivalent basis on a factor the buyer's formulator accepts, with corrosion-resistant handling and dosing equipment priced in for the liquid route.

Question 60

How do buyers compare feed additive and premix offers that are not identical?

Accepted Answer

They are made comparable, not accepted as offered. Fix one controlled specification, one approved inclusion rate and one delivery basis, then compare delivered cost per declared unit of active and per tonne of finished feed. Matrix values, performance claims and savings claims stay outside the price comparison unless evidence and contract terms support them.

Question 61

Does FeedMatch publish live feed ingredient prices?

Accepted Answer

No. FeedMatch does not publish live prices, market indices or supplier quotations. It structures the requirement, prepares the RFQ and organises comparable proposals; every price comes from the supplier as a firm, time-bound quotation against one controlled specification.

Question 62

What should a vitamin-mineral premix RFQ specify?

Accepted Answer

The target species and feed phase, the inclusion rate approved by the buyer's nutritionist, the guaranteed level of each vitamin and trace element per kilogram of premix, the chemical form of each source, the carrier, maximum moisture, contaminant and heavy-metal limits, packaging, shelf life, storage conditions, destination-market authorisations and the documents required with each lot.

Question 63

Should a feed mill buy a complete premix or source individual vitamins and trace minerals?

Accepted Answer

It depends on the mill's dosing equipment, mixing accuracy, storage control, quality-control capability and volume. A complete premix moves formulation and blending responsibility to the premix supplier; individual micro-ingredients give more control but require precise micro-dosing, stock rotation and in-house quality control. The decision should be made with the buyer's nutritionist and process engineer, not on price alone.

Question 64

How are premix offers from different suppliers made comparable?

Accepted Answer

Convert every offer to the same basis: identical guaranteed levels per kilogram, the same approved inclusion rate, the same delivery term and the same document set. Then compare delivered cost per tonne of finished feed. Offers that change nutrient levels, carriers or inclusion rates are separate proposals that need nutritional review before they can be compared.

Feed procurement answers

FeedMatch, projects and tools