FinancingFeed working capital, export credit, trade finance & asset leasing — explore options
Reference Delivery

Batching and automation retrofit — Poland

Anonymized reference project: a commercial Polish mill selling to third-party farms replaced manual micro-dosing and paper batch records with automated dosing, weighing and full batch traceability, driven by customer audits rather than capacity.

Poland
Country
Feed milling (multi-species commercial mill)
Category
40 t/h · 240,000 t/year
Scale
3
Reference outcomes

Load requirements

Design loads used to size housing, utilities and equipment.

Dosing points
18 macro, 24 micro, 6 liquid
Weighing accuracy
±0.1% macro, ±0.5% micro
Batch size
4 t, 6 min cycle
Records
Per-batch lot genealogy, 5-year retention
Integration
Existing ERP order import, no replacement
Cutover
Rolling, no full shutdown

Results

Representative KPIs achieved on projects of this scope.

Micro dosing accuracy
±0.4% achieved
Mixer CV
4.2% on tracer test
Recall drill
One step back and forward in 3.5 h
Batch record retrieval
Under 1 working day
Giveaway
0.9% of ingredient cost, from 1.8%

Challenges and how they were resolved

What went wrong in the first definition of the requirement, and what changed before suppliers quoted.

Giveaway hidden inside averages

Monthly reconciliation looked acceptable, but batch-level weighing showed persistent over-dosing on three high-cost ingredients.

ResolutionScale resolution and dosing tolerance were specified per ingredient class instead of as a single mill-wide figure, which is what made the giveaway visible and correctable.

Audit trail broke at the premix step

Premix lots were recorded on paper and could not be linked to a finished batch, so a one-step-forward recall drill failed.

ResolutionMicro-ingredient lot capture at the dosing point was made a mandatory line in the requirement, and the traceability readiness checklist was used to define the gap list suppliers had to close.

Integrators quoted different control philosophies

Offers ranged from a PLC-only upgrade to a full MES replacement, a 4× price spread with no common basis.

ResolutionThe RFQ fixed the control boundary — batching and traceability in scope, ERP untouched — so all offers described the same system.

The numbers

Indicative capital and operating figures for a project of this scope. Ranges, not quotations.

Retrofit CAPEXUSD 1.9M–2.4M
Ingredient giveaway savedUSD 6.40/t
Labour−2.5 FTE across shifts
Unplanned downtime−34% batching-related stops
Payback1.9 years including labour and giveaway

Representative outcomes

  • Manual micro additions cut from 11 per batch to 2
  • Batch records produced for an auditor inside one working day
  • Ingredient giveaway reduced on every macro line

Run these numbers yourself

Background reading

Note: This case study is an anonymized reference scenario. Specific client identities, contract values and commercial terms are withheld under NDA. Figures reflect typical outcomes for projects of this scope and are not a guarantee for your project.

Get a Free QuoteExplore Financing