主要ポイント
- Evidence matches the proposed ingredient, site and scope.
- Dates, lot references and test methods are recorded.
- Every material gap has an owner, next action and approval decision.
What must be defined before requesting evidence?
Record the species and intended use, ingredient grade, purchase volume, destination, storage plan and the buyer’s acceptance specification. Identify which hazards, processing steps and supply-chain handoffs matter for this material. Let the quality team choose relevant limits and methods; do not copy a generic legal or certification requirement into every request.
Which questions should the team send?
Use the evidence-request table below. Identify the producing site and the role responsible for each answer. Ask for a recent relevant record rather than a yes/no declaration. Commercial contacts may coordinate the response, but quality and operations should support technical answers. Protect commercially sensitive records and request only information needed for the review.
How should the answers be evaluated?
For each question record the document reference, date, scope, reviewer, status and follow-up owner. Separate missing evidence from evidence of a failure. Neither deserves an invented score or an automatic pass. Escalate material safety or traceability gaps for qualified review before a commercial commitment; an unresolved issue must remain visible.
When are additional checks needed?
A desk review may leave questions about the actual site, process or material. Agree targeted laboratory work, a qualified site audit or a trial receiving plan where risk justifies it. Define the scope and acceptance decision in advance. None of these measures removes all risk, and a certificate covers only its stated entity, activity and validity period.
What happens after approval?
Reference the approved specification and sampling plan in the purchase terms. Record receiving results and complaints against lots, not only supplier names. Reopen the review when the producing site, ingredient process, origin, subcontractor or specification changes. Set review dates according to risk rather than assuming an approval lasts forever.
How does FeedMatch handle supplier outreach?
The buyer prepares the brief with free tools. The USD 250,000 minimum applies only to plant and equipment projects. Feed, ingredient, premix and additive purchases have no minimum. FeedMatch reviews requests by specification, volume/frequency and destination and organises the brief before the team contacts suitable suppliers and presents organised responses. Buyers do not receive a direct supplier connection. A questionnaire does not imply supplier verification, guaranteed availability, response time or commercial terms.
| Risk area | Question | Evidence to request |
|---|---|---|
| Identity and scope | Which legal entity and site produce this grade? | Site identity, process description and responsible quality role. |
| Lot traceability | Can this example lot be traced through production and dispatch? | Dated lot records, identifiers and the traceability procedure. |
| Quality and sampling | How is conformity to our specification checked? | Relevant COA, methods, sampling plan and handling of deviations. |
| Contamination controls | How are relevant contamination and cross-contact risks controlled? | Risk assessment, applicable monitoring records and corrective actions. |
| Storage and transport | How are moisture, pests, clean transport and segregation managed? | Inspection and cleaning records for the proposed route and handling plan. |
| Changes and complaints | Who notifies us of changes and closes nonconformities? | Change-notification procedure, complaint example and closure evidence. |
確認事項
- Evidence matches the proposed ingredient, site and scope.
- Dates, lot references and test methods are recorded.
- Every material gap has an owner, next action and approval decision.
管理すべきリスク
- A sales declaration replaces technical evidence.
- Certificate scope or validity does not match the offered material.
- Unresolved gaps disappear when a price is accepted.
よくある誤り
- Treating a completed questionnaire as verified qualification.
- Demanding irrelevant documents and exposing unnecessary confidential data.
- Reusing old approval after a material site or process change.
よくある質問
Is this a certification checklist?
No. It is a risk-based evidence template. Check applicable requirements and any certificate’s scope separately with qualified advisers.
Who should answer?
The responsible quality and operations roles should support technical answers; the commercial contact can coordinate them.
How should missing documents be handled?
Record the missing item, its relevance, a follow-up owner and a review decision. Do not silently count it as a pass.
Does a desk questionnaire replace an audit?
No. A site audit, laboratory check or receiving trial may be appropriate where the unresolved risk warrants it.
Does FeedMatch connect me directly with suppliers?
No. FeedMatch reviews the RFQ, handles supplier outreach and presents organised responses through its team.
Sources and limitations
Free tools and next steps
Tools are free and without obligation. The USD 250,000 minimum applies only to plant and equipment projects. Feed, ingredient, premix and additive purchases have no minimum. Our team reviews requests by specification, volume/frequency and destination, organises your brief, contacts suitable suppliers and presents organised responses through FeedMatch. There is no direct buyer–supplier connection; availability and terms are not guaranteed.
Prepare a team-reviewed RFQ