We source the solution,
not just the supplier.
Tell us the problem — FCR drift, protein cost, mycotoxin pressure, pellet durability, layer persistency. We engineer the answer across ingredients, additives, premix and formulation, then put certified suppliers in competition on one clean specification.
Outcomes we source for
Every engagement is scored against a measurable outcome, not a vendor list.
Engineered amino-acid, enzyme and origin decisions that move FCR — not just a cheaper tonne of SBM.
Least-cost formulation rebalanced with synthetic AA, phytase matrix uplift and origin switches — typically USD 8–25/t saved.
Diagnose PDI, die geometry, conditioning and binder use before quoting a mill upgrade or binder supplier.
Screen exposure, then source binders, enzymes or origin swaps that actually match the toxin profile.
Suppliers quote on identical spec, packaging and Incoterm — real comparisons, not marketing decks.
Only certified suppliers matching your region and shipment mode enter the RFQ.
Two very different procurement models
Supplier-first platform
- ✕Matches a buyer to a seller
- ✕Returns a directory of vendors
- ✕Optimizes for vendor advertising spend
- ✕Buyer drowns in emails on different specs
- ✕Outcome (FCR, €/kg) is buyer's problem
FeedMatch — solution-first
- ✓Starts from the outcome
- ✓Engineers the answer, then sources
- ✓Supplier-neutral by construction
- ✓Quotes on one common specification
- ✓Outcome is the deliverable
How a solution brief becomes tonnage
Short guided intake: species, stage, current diet matrix, observed performance, and the actual constraint (cost, spec, certification, timeline).
One or more solution paths — ingredient substitution, enzyme/premix intervention, origin switch, mill upgrade — with nutritional and economic implications spelled out.
RFQ goes only to qualified suppliers that can deliver that specific answer, in your region, with the required certifications and Incoterm.
Quotes come back on a common basis so the comparison is real. No hidden spec differences, no marketing noise.
Logistics, documentation and third-party financing coordinated in one workspace until the tonnage lands at your mill.
Frequently asked
What is solution-first sourcing in animal feed?+
It's a procurement approach that starts with the buyer's outcome — FCR, cost per kg of gain, mycotoxin risk, pellet durability — engineers the ingredient/additive/formulation answer, and only then runs a supplier-neutral RFQ against that engineered specification.
How is this different from a supplier directory?+
A directory matches buyers to sellers of a named ingredient. FeedMatch diagnoses the underlying performance or cost problem, proposes one or more engineered solution paths, and only then invites certified suppliers to compete on a common spec and Incoterm.
Will this lower my finished feed cost?+
Usually yes. Levers such as partial soybean-meal replacement with sunflower meal plus synthetic lysine/methionine, phytate-phosphorus release via phytase, or origin switches typically save USD 8–25 per tonne without sacrificing bird performance.
Is FeedMatch supplier-neutral?+
Yes. Because the engineered answer is chosen before the supplier, no manufacturer relationship biases the specification. Suppliers compete strictly on price, lead time, GMP+/FAMI-QS/ISO 22000/HACCP certification and after-sales.
When should I just ask for a supplier instead?+
If your goal is genuinely the cheapest tonne of one defined ingredient at a defined spec, a direct RFQ is fine — and FeedMatch will source it. Solution-first applies when the real goal is an outcome (FCR, €/kg gain, mycotoxin control, PDI).
Ready to describe the problem, not chase suppliers?
Share your species, stage, current diet, and the outcome you're targeting. We come back with an engineered solution and a supplier-neutral RFQ — usually within 48 business hours.